John Roach, Esq. | March 2, 2026 | All Things Trial \ California Law \ Car Accidents
Landmark Verdict Upheld: $243 Million Awarded in Tesla Autopilot Fatal Crash Case
On February 20, 2026, a federal judge upheld a $243 million jury verdict against Tesla — the first federal jury verdict in a fatal Autopilot case to survive post-trial challenge. The ruling by Judge Beth Bloom in the Southern District of Florida rejected Tesla’s arguments… read more
John Roach, Esq. | February 26, 2026 | California Law
Castle Peak Avalanche: Criminal Negligence Probe Signals Massive Wrongful Death Potential—Lessons for Tahoe Skiers
On February 17, 2026, a slab avalanche near Castle Peak north of Donner Pass killed nine people out of a 15-person group; of the six who survived, two were injured badly enough to require hospitalization, while the other four were not seriously hurt. It is… read more
John Roach, Esq. | February 23, 2026 | All Things Trial
The Meta Addiction Lawsuit Trial: A Landmark Battle Over Social Media’s Impact on Young Minds
A Los Angeles Superior Court jury is currently hearing evidence in what may be the most consequential product liability trial involving a technology company in American history. The case — a bellwether trial in the coordinated litigation against Meta Platforms and Google — tests whether… read more
John Roach, Esq. | February 20, 2026 | All Things Trial
Groundbreaking $8.5 Million Jury Verdict Against Uber in Sexual Assault Case: A Beacon of Hope for Victims
On February 5, 2026, a federal jury in Phoenix, Arizona returned an $8.5 million verdict against Uber in a passenger sexual assault case — the first time Uber has been found liable by a federal jury for failing to prevent the sexual assault of a… read more
John Roach, Esq. | February 16, 2026 | Attorney Tips \ California Law \ Car Accidents
Can Uber or Lyft Be Held Liable for Driver Negligence in California After Prop 22?
California rideshare accident cases raise legal questions that go well beyond a standard car accident claim. When you are injured by an Uber or Lyft driver, you are not just dealing with that driver’s personal auto insurance — you are dealing with a corporate entity,… read more
John Roach, Esq. | February 13, 2026 | California Law \ Car Accidents
California Dooring Injury: How Cyclists Can Claim Compensation Under State Law
It happens in less than a second. You are riding through San Francisco, Oakland, or anywhere in the Bay Area — moving with traffic, fully alert — when a car door swings open directly into your path. There is no time to brake. The impact… read more
John Roach, Esq. | February 9, 2026 | California Law \ Car Accidents
Understanding Contingency Fees in Personal Injury Cases: A Guide for Victims
One of the first questions every seriously injured person asks when they call my office is: “How do you get paid?” The answer is a contingency fee — and understanding how it works is important before you sign any retainer agreement with any attorney. This… read more
John Roach, Esq. | February 5, 2026 | Car Accidents
Achieving Quick Resolution in Catastrophic Injury Cases: A $1.6 Million Pre-Litigation Settlement Success
In March 2025, my client was struck by a vehicle in Piedmont while crossing the street. She suffered a comminuted right hip fracture, a right sacral fracture, a left pubic fracture, and a right inferior pubic ramus fracture — catastrophic orthopedic injuries that permanently altered… read more
John Roach, Esq. | February 2, 2026 | Attorney Tips
AI for Personal Injury Lawyers: Harness the Power
Artificial intelligence has changed how I run my solo personal injury practice — not by replacing the legal judgment that wins cases, but by compressing the time it takes to do the work that supports that judgment. Research that once took hours, deposition summaries that… read more
John Roach, Esq. | January 29, 2026 | All Things Trial
Converse v. Adkins: $300,000 Verdict in Dog Jump Injury Case – Trial Strategies and Lessons from My Recent Win
On April 28, 2025, a jury in Alameda Superior Court awarded my client Gail Converse $300,000 in non-economic damages — with no reduction for comparative fault — in a case that did not involve a dog bite. There was no mauling, no broken skin, no… read more